Rudolf Guiliani Should Be Disbarred

-

 

It must be fun to be pals with the President of the United States, unless the president is a megalomaniac {a person obsessed with his own power). Rudolf Giuliani fully understands each legal rule I am about to state.  In politics anything goes.  However, in law there are rules enacted to prevent frivolous vexatious lawsuits. The fact that the president dreams of throwing out millions of votes does not excuse Mr. Giuliani arguing a frivolous lawsuit in Pennsylvania yesterday (Tuesday, November 17).

              A vexatious lawsuit is a legal action brought solely to harass or subdue an adversary.

              It can be frivolous, burdensome or unwarranted.

              A judge may issue sanctions against the party and or his lawyer.

              That may be one of the reasons many firms have recently dropped the president as a client.

              Opposing parties bring malicious prosecution lawsuits against vexatious litigants.

               They can obtain damages.

               People, who are mentally ill, bring many vexatious lawsuits.      

               Busy trial courts all over the country have their calendars clogged by frivolous lawsuits.

               At bottom, Mr. Giuliani’s argument is he would like to go look for evidence. However, the law requires that a party must show evidence supporting the complaint.

                Judges have dismissed Trump’s cases in other states. That gave Mr. Giuliani notice that he has an unmeritorious case.

                 I join with others that have called for Mr. Giuliani’s disbarment from the legal profession. He would be entitled to a trial. However, there is plenty of evidence against him.

               Copyright 2020 James J. Brosnahan 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The American Establishment Wants to Stop Voter Theft

-
       The business community and the legal community have had enough of the public vote theft. There is a full-page advertisement in the  New York Times  today listing approximately 100 major American corporations and almost all of the large law firms (including Morrison Foerster LLP) in the United States, in opposition to the public voter theft being enacted in several states.      Senator McConnell has overplayed his hand and is now in political trouble. It is often the American establishment that has to step forward and save our democratic form of government. Forty-seven states have pending or enacted statutes with the aim of reducing the vote. Those statutes eviscerate our democratic form of government. The immediate and widespread reaction of citizens was to stop doing business with any company that tolerated voter reduction or theft, and so it should be.      A bill pending in the congress now would establish a bipartisa...
Read more

Senator McConnell Has Inverted the Process of Democratic Discussion by Telling His Base of American Business to Stay Out of Politics

-
  Senator McConnell’s lecturing of American business to stay out of politics was hastily followed by his statement he was not talking about contributions . That lecture represented a reversal of normal political dialogue. In a democracy it is the voters who tell the office holders what they need and what they want. It is not the office holders who instruct the voters as to what they’re allowed to do. Under the First Amendment as declared by the US Supreme Court on several occasions, corporations have a right to express political opinions. Efforts to reduce the vote is among the most important subjects for public discussion. There’s something more important about what McConnell did. He took an axe to the republican base. For a number of years the republican hierarchy has been trying to manage a joining of American business with right-wing groups, some of them with extreme positions. It has been effective at times. But the recent praise by Senator Johnson of Wisconsin, lavished o...
Read more

John F. Kennedy's Speech on Religion - September 12, 1960

-
On Sept. 12, 1960, presidential candidate John F. Kennedy gave a major speech to the Greater Houston Ministerial Association, a group of Protestant ministers, on the issue of his religion. At the time, many Protestants questioned whether Kennedy's Roman Catholic faith would allow him to make important national decisions as president independent of the church. Kennedy addressed those concerns before a skeptical audience of Protestant clergy. The following is a transcript of Kennedy's speech: Kennedy: Rev. Meza, Rev. Reck, I'm grateful for your generous invitation to speak my views. While the so-called religious issue is necessarily and properly the chief topic here tonight, I want to emphasize from the outset that we have far more critical issues to face in the 1960 election: the spread of Communist influence, until it now festers 90 miles off the coast of Florida; the humiliating treatment of our president and vice president by those who no longer respect our power; the hun...
Read more